Company Uniqueness Summary

Oil Company Experience of Company Key Directors

Mr. Clavareau Dr. Schumacher are geologists who have worked for exploration companies; Dr. Schumacher spent 20 years with Phillips Petroleum and Pennzoil working US and International projects; Mr. Clavareau has worked around the world as a petroleum geologist.

E&P GeoFS is one of the few (POSSIBLE THE ONLY) Surface Geochemistry exploration companies whose leadership has actually worked as petroleum exploration geologists and is thus uniquely aware of what information and data format the client needs. The company was founded in 2003, based in Paris since 2008 and Singapore since 2016.

Breadth and Depth of Geochemical Exploration Experience

Mr. Luigi has spent more than 25 years organizing and conducting surface geochemical exploration surveys worldwide, has actively participate in developing sampling, analytical techniques; Dr. Schumacher was introduced to petroleum geology/geochemistry by Phillips and has spent 40 years acquiring and interpreting surface geochemical data. Both are recognized in the industry for their knowledge of hydrocarbon exploration surveys and had published several articles, Dr. Schumacher has published several books on the topic.

Global Experience

E&P GeoField Services Key Directors were Cofounders of GeoMicrobial Tech International France and GMT South America and worked for its predecessor, GeoMicrobial Technologies USA, our Key Directors have worked in more than 60 countries conducting successfully geochemical surveys in environments ranging from the tropics to the arctic, from jungles to deserts to grassland. And likely we are the team that had conducted more surveys in deserts across North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Southwest Asia, Australia, as well as in North and South America. Here is a list of some of our desert surveys – Algeria, Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Iran, Mali, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somaliland, Sudan, Tunisia, Turkey, and Yemen. During the course of these surveys, we have learned the advantages and limitation (or strengths and weaknesses) of the various hydrocarbon detection methods. Our philosophy is to use a number of independent but complimentary methods so that if local conditions are unfavorable for one technique, the others are still effective; most commonly we use Microbial, Soil Gas (acid extraction), and Fluorescence for each survey; other techniques are available if and when warranted. We also recognize that the main source of ambiguity or interpretation error in geochemical surveys is under-sampling (i.e., collecting too few samples for the exploration objective).